Circulating supply verification: a record CoinGecko and CMC can review

Which records support a circulating-supply figure?

The first artifact is a source map linking each material supply figure to a record. It shows what the project can substantiate and where a reviewer may need more context. We build it from project materials and public token records you provide.

Start with these four evidence groups:

1. Issuance: contract or explorer records for tokens created and any confirmed burns.
2. Allocation: the project’s stated distribution across treasury, team, investors, and other categories.
3. Restrictions: vesting terms, lock information, or other documents explaining why a balance is not treated as circulating.
4. Public reporting: figures and dates shown in project materials and on the two tracker profiles.

For each item, we note its source, date, and relevance to the calculation. A wallet label alone does not explain who controls the balance or what restriction applies. Where a contract enforces a lock, include the relevant contract or explorer evidence. For a contractual or operational restriction, include the project record that describes it.

Keep token name, ticker, chain, and contract address consistent across the folder. We flag missing sources separately from verified facts. This makes it easier to decide whether to correct a figure, obtain evidence, or explain an assumption. For a CMC-focused walkthrough, see the circulating supply verification guide.

How do you trace a mismatch between supply figures?

A reconciliation table identifies which figure measures issued, restricted, or circulating tokens. It prevents a project from carrying one unexplained number into a new request. We compare the reported amount with contract or explorer records, allocation materials, and current public statements.

The comparison also separates a real supply change from a reporting difference. A release, distribution, or confirmed burn may require the project to update more than a tracker profile. Keep the earlier figure and record why the team revised it.

If a value cannot be supported, mark it unresolved rather than presenting it as established. Then identify the missing source and decide whether the project can obtain it. When you need broader profile changes alongside the supply record, review CoinGecko listing support and CoinMarketCap listing support.

What changes between CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap requests?

Two platform requests need separate preparation, even when they rely on the same underlying calculation. CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap have their own profile workflows and current submission instructions. We adapt the explanation and supporting materials to the information being updated on each platform.

Each draft identifies the reported circulating figure, the components included or excluded, and the evidence for material balances. We also compare the request with the project’s website, token documents, and existing profile. This check helps surface conflicts before submission.

Use this sequence for both requests:

1. Confirm the official token name, ticker, chain, and contract address.
2. Check that the calculation and its source records agree.
3. Prepare the explanation for the specific profile update.
4. Keep a copy of the submitted text and attachments.

The project’s authorized representative retains control of official accounts. If a reviewer asks for clarification, answer that point with the relevant source. Do not resend a large, unrelated document bundle. Our work supports supply information; it does not replace a platform’s broader listing application. See the listings and verification overview if the project needs to plan adjacent profile work.

What does the supply review put in your hands?

The handover gives your team a traceable calculation, a clear list of evidence gaps, and materials prepared for the selected platform requests. The precise scope follows the token structure and records available. Several vesting arrangements or treasury balances may require more reconciliation than a simple allocation record.

Typical handover items include:

• A supply-component worksheet with sources and stated assumptions.
• A list of conflicting figures and missing evidence.
• Draft explanations adapted for CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap.
• A submission record and outstanding follow-up items.

We assign an account contact to coordinate document review. Your authorized representative keeps account access and approves final materials. The contact can ask about a specific balance or source, then record the answer against the relevant item.

The working sequence has five stages: receive the token record, map supply components, prepare platform-specific materials, support submission, and log replies. Preparation begins once the core documents are available. Missing wallet attribution, allocation records, or internal approval can add a review loop. The project can also use our CoinGecko listing support or CoinMarketCap listing support when profile work extends beyond supply information.

Which parts of a supply update remain with each platform?

A submission record shows what the project sent, but it cannot determine a platform’s decision. CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap assess the supplied evidence under their own review practices. They decide whether it supports an update and what figure appears on the profile. Acceptance, interpretation, and the timing of a profile change are outside our control.

Our responsibility is the agreed evidence review, clear supporting text, submission assistance through the authorized project contact, and a record of follow-up. If the source data is incomplete, revised wording cannot replace missing records. If a reviewer requests another document, the project must be able to provide it.

Before starting, send the token name, ticker, chain, contract address, current figures on each platform, and available supply or allocation documents. We will assess whether the evidence supports a focused review and outline the next work. For related changes after a contract migration or rebrand, see contract migration and rebranding updates. Send us that source folder to begin; GeoMarketing Experts will review it and return a scoped plan for CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, or both.

How it works

1. 1. Share the token recordSend the contract and chain details, current platform figures, and supply documents. Your project keeps control of official accounts.
2. 2. Map supply componentsWe compare the reported figure with issuance, allocation, lock, vesting, and wallet evidence. We flag unresolved items.
3. 3. Prepare platform materialsWe draft a consistent calculation explanation and adapt the supporting materials for CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap.
4. 4. Support the submissionYour authorized representative submits through the relevant platform channel. We assist with the prepared materials.
5. 5. Record repliesWe log the submitted evidence and help prepare a focused response if a reviewer requests clarification.